lets have a wild sexction
do you like to have a wild sexual section with a capable male then respond.
Ahh, how fondly I remember my days with the New York Philharmonic. The lilting sounds of the flute section, the dulcet tones of the french horn section, the delicate strains of the violin section. And who can forget the sweaty grunts of the wild sexual section?
Honestly, I have no idea what this guy was going for here. Maybe “sexual session?” Though that still doesn’t explain the bizarre word mash-up in the post’s title.
I’d also like to point out that while every woman would like her lover to be “capable,” it’s hardly a ringing endorsement. His capability for achieving and maintaining an erection are not in question here. The likelihood of copulation, on the other hand, is completely debatable.
gromm said,
June 25, 2009 @ 1:33 am
ESL anyone?
willnotgetyoulaid said,
June 25, 2009 @ 9:33 am
I always hope they’re ESL when they’re this incomprehensible, but I’ve been proven wrong before on that.